I remain grateful to The Post for publishing this rebuttal. I ask citizens to not encourage dissent outside democratic processes. If one seeks to prove a scientific claim about why human beings behave the way they do, one should study a science.
A recent letter did not provide justice to my exam of a policy and did not react to an argument. The reaction distorted the examination of the policy and misses the original claim that if the governors of a public university view human behavior as an arbitrary distinction among students, gender-neutrality should be adopted and then consistently and universally applied as its policy.
I am grateful for the readers of my letters to The Post, and will continue sending examinations to be read and discussed in this newspaper. I encourage all discussion of ideas to remain in context and available by The Post and its staff, whether in print or on the Internet.
Christopher Myers is a senior studying philosophy.
